Home Forum Register Arcade Members List New Posts
Username: Password:

Welcome to the Asians, Inc. Asian Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our Awesome! community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Go Back   Asians, Inc. Asian Forums > Special Interests > Beavers & Tail
Endangered Animals 100 Times Worse Off than Previously Believed
Old 07-04-2008, 02:38 AM   #1 (permalink)
Porsche
 
richardp996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Age: 26
Posts: 4,441
Rep Power: 16 richardp996 pities the foo' that don't stay in school, sucka!richardp996 pities the foo' that don't stay in school, sucka!richardp996 pities the foo' that don't stay in school, sucka!richardp996 pities the foo' that don't stay in school, sucka!richardp996 pities the foo' that don't stay in school, sucka!richardp996 pities the foo' that don't stay in school, sucka!richardp996 pities the foo' that don't stay in school, sucka!
Send a message via AIM to richardp996 Send a message via MSN to richardp996
Endangered Animals 100 Times Worse Off than Previously Believed

Scientists create a new system for modeling risk and discover that some species may be far more endangered than ever imagined

Adding insult to injury, many species that are already solidly facing extinction might actually be 100 times more endangered than previously thought, scientists say. A new mathematical model, developed by ecologists at the University of Colorado at Boulder and the University of California, produces extinction risks that are orders of magnitude higher than conservation biologists estimated in compilations like the IUCN red-list.

Older risk models may not work well enough, a letter, published in Nature by Boulder ecologist Brett Melbourne, reports. Traditional models rely on two main factors: The number of random events affecting individuals within a species, and the impact of things like temperature and weather changes on a species. But when Melbourne and colleagues added sex variations and physical variations between individuals into their model, risk went up a hundredfold.

Melbourne and colleagues made their new model by observing beetles in the lab. Natural populations, they argue, have even more individual variation than lab animals—a compelling reason, the authors say, to re-evaluate what endangered really means.
__________________
'We don't build the GT3 for bad drivers,'
Andreas Preuninger, Project Manager High Performance Cars: Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG
richardp996 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Content Copyright ©1997 - 2008, Asians, Inc.